Speaking in a media interview Dave Hartnett, the Permanent Secretary for Tax at the UK HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), revealed that the Government’s Lichtenstein Disclosure Facility (LDF) is now expected to achieve three times the revenues levels than originally projected. The LDF allows taxpayers with undeclared assets hidden in Lichtenstein to disclose their financial affairs in return for reduced penalty rates on any unpaid taxes.

According to Dave Hartnett, over 1 200 taxpayers have already come forward and declared their hidden assets through the LDF, since the program started in September 2009. The Minister added that the LDF will continue running until March 31st 2015, indicating that much greater numbers of taxpayers could still come forward. With the amount of disclosures being made, the HMRC has revised the profit estimates for the LDF to GBP 3 billion over the program’s lifetime, compared to the initial projection of GBP 1 billion.

Under the LDF taxpayers who come forward with full disclosures of their previously hidden assets and unsettled tax liabilities will only be levied a 10 percent penalty. Typical HMRC tax-evasion investigation procedures can see penalties of 100 percent levied on any unpaid taxes. Additionally, tax liabilities will only be assessed for the previous 10 years on any information brought foward through the LDF, unlike the currently operating New Disclosure Opportunity program which has an assesment period of 20 years. Dave Hartnett suggested that the reduced penalties are compelling taxpayers with hidden assets in offshore financial centres around the world to make transfers to Lichtenstein, in order to utilize the LDF. Describing the overall success of the program Dave Hartnett said, “..the people who have come forward are changing their ways and getting peace of mind, and are getting a good deal on penalties. We are getting money for the exchequer.”

Photo by adamwilcox

The German Government has disclosed that it has been offered information by an anonymous informant regarding numerous German nationals allegedly holding undisclosed wealth in Swiss bank accounts. In a statement made on February 1st German Chancellor Angela Merkel stated that the Government should do everything within its power to obtain this data, on the condition that it is proven relevant to its fight on tax evasion. The stance has set Germany at heads with Switzerland, whose Government issued a counter statement saying that the move would constitute a breach of good faith between the nations and a gross violation of client confidentiality. Further, it has been made clear by the Swiss Government that it will not provide any administrative support if Germany proceeds with the decision.

Wolfgang Schäuble, Finance Minister of Germany, has declared that his department wishes to proceed with the acquisition, though he has displayed much greater levels of caution. In a statement on the same day he disclosed that the informant would be paid €2.5 million for the information, as long as the deal could proceed without breaching any legal statutes.

Statements by the German Finance Minister indicated that the Government believes to hold a legal precedent under which it could pursue the data purchase, following several international court’s decisions to uphold a similar purchase of stolen information regarding Liechtenstein bank accounts by the German Government in 2007.

Photo by cgommel

A total of €2,234.88 million was granted in state aid across the three surveyed countries in 2008, indicating an overall increase in grants across the countries. 98.9 percent of this amount was accounted for by aid granted by the Norwegian government.

The report shows that the primary contributions to the 2008 state aid increase were Norway’s tax relief schemes to the maritime sector and compensation to Norwegian farmers for pollution reductions. Lichtenstein increased state aid by 29 percent in 2008, all through funding of cultural and heritage projects. Between the three surveyed countries only Iceland decreased state aid in 2008, lowering their grants by 32.3% compared to 2007.

Norway provided 0.54 percent of it’s GDP in governments grants, compared to Iceland’s 0.13 percent and Liechtenstein’s 0.03 percent. The EU average for the same period was 0.42 percent of GDP. However, if crisis package aid is included in the statistics, then the level of aid granted in Norway is only a quarter of that is average for the countries of EU.

The European Free Trade Association is an intergovernmental organization set up for the promotion of free trade and economic integration to the benefit of its four member states: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland.

Photo by NHD-INFO

It was reveled on November 11th by Klaus Tschütscher, Liechtenstein Prime Minister, that the nation will be considered as adequately complying with the G20′s and OECD’s efforts to combat international tax evasion. By signing Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEA) with Belgium and Netherlands, Liechtenstein has brought their total agreement number to the required minimum of twelve to be judged as having substantially implemented the internationally agreed standard in exchange of fiscal information. The status change also circumvents possible sanctions or actions from G20 nations, directed at jurisdictions they deem to be uncooperative in taxation matters.

Commenting on the event, the Prime Minister said, “I think this is a good standpoint for the future, though of course it’s an intermediate step,” he continued on to say “We are working in open markets, in a globalized world, so tax evasion should be marginalized”. Klaus Tschütscher also pronounced that the removal of the country’s “grey list” status is a “milestone”. Displaying his backing to these words, Liechtenstein is already in negotiation with more countries for similar tax information agreements and has joined Global Forum in Transparency and Exchange of Information.

Angel Gurría, OECD Secretary-General, praising the country on its efforts said, “I would like to commend Liechtenstein for its swift implementation of the OECD standard on exchange of information. After its acceptance of the standard on 12 March 2009, Liechtenstein has within a few months turned into reality its commitment to fully cooperate in tax matters. I would like to congratulate Prime Minister Klaus Tschütscher for his leadership and continued efforts in this process”.

The London G20 Summit, held on the 2nd of April this year, heralded an unprecedented wave of Tax Information Exchange Agreement (TIEA). In what was described as “revolutionary” by Angel Gurría, OECD Secretary-General, the number of completed TIEAs has almost doubled since their inception in late 2000.
Since the G20 summit, and subsequent global push for greater tax transparency and compliance, the following 53 agreements have been signed.

United States – Monaco (8 September 2009)
Denmark – Turks & Caicos Islands (7 September 2009)
Netherlands – Antigua & Barbuda (2 September 2009)
Denmark – Gibraltar (2 September 2009)
Denmark – Anguilla (2 September 2009)
Germany – Liechtenstein (2 September 2009)
Netherlands – St Vincent & the Grenadines (1 September 2009)
Denmark – St Vincent & Grenadines (1 September 2009)
Denmark – St Kitts & Nevis (1 September 2009)
Netherlands – St Kitts & Nevis (1 September 2009)
Canada – Netherlands Antilles (29 August 2009)
United Kingdom – Gibraltar (27 August 2009)
Australia – Gibraltar (25 August 2009)
New Zealand – British Virgin Islands (14 August 2009)
New Zealand – Cayman Islands (14 August 2009)
New Zealand – Gibraltar (13 August 2009)
Germany – Gibraltar (13 August 2009)
United Kingdom – Liechtenstein (11 August 2009)
Monaco – San Marino (29 July 2009)
Bermuda – Ireland (28 July 2009)
New Zealand – Isle of Man (27 July 2009)
New Zealand – Jersey (27 July 2009)
United Kingdom – Turks & Caicos (23 July 2009)
Netherlands – Turks & Caicos (22 July 2009)
Netherlands – Anguilla (22 July 2009)
Ireland – Turks & Caicos (22 July 2009)
Ireland – Anguilla (22 July 2009)
New Zealand – Guernsey (21 July 2009)
UK – Anguilla (20 July 2009)
Belgium – Monaco (15 July 2009)
New Zealand – Cook Islands (9 July 2009)
Netherlands – Cayman Islands (8 July 2009)
Germany – Bermuda (3 July 2009)
Ireland – Gibraltar (24 June 2009)
Ireland – Cayman Islands (23 June 2009)
France – British Virgin Islands (17 June 09)
Australia – Jersey (10 June 2009)
The Netherlands – Bermuda (8 June 2009)
Denmark – British Virgin Islands (19 May 2009)
Faroes – British Virgin Islands (19 May 2009)
Finland – British Virgin Islands (19 May 2009)
Greenland – British Virgin Islands (19 May 2009)
Iceland – British Virgin Islands (19 May 2009)
Norway – British Virgin Islands (19 May 2009)
Sweden – British Virgin Islands (19 May 2009)
New Zealand – Bermuda (17 April 2009)
Denmark – Bermuda (16 April 2009)
Faroes – Bermuda (16 April 2009)
Finland – Bermuda (16 April 2009)
Greenland – Bermuda (16 April 2009)
Iceland – Bermuda (16 April 2009)
Norway – Bermuda (16 April 2009)
Sweden – Bermuda (16 April 2009)

Previous to these, 63 agreements had been signed, bringing the total at the 10th of September to 116.